MAAY vs. IBTF
MAAY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. MAAY is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MAAY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
MAAY vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MAAY
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -27.32%
- YTD
- -18.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
MAAY vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | -18.99% | -29.75% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAAY and IBTF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAAY vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
MAAY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTF
MAAY vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAAY | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 8.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 45.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 296.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAAY vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAAY drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAY and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAAY | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.92% | -10.45% | -35.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.09% | 0.00% | -43.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -3.26% | -30.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
MAAY vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAAY | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.60% | 0.30% | +28.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.60% | 2.36% | +26.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.60% | 2.54% | +26.06% |
MAAY vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAAY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAAY vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 164.83%, more than IBTF's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 1.72% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
MAAY GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF | 164.83% | 31.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAAY and IBTF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MAAY.
MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 164.83%, compared with 1.72% for IBTF.
MAAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MAAY and 0.07% for IBTF.
Find the right allocation for MAAY and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer