MA vs. SOXQ
MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is a stock, while SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, MA returned 7.47%/yr vs 32.00%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MA vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 77.75% return.
MA
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- 6M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 1Y
- -7.02%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 20.05%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 66.25%
- YTD
- 77.75%
- 1Y
- 123.76%
- 3Y*
- 52.99%
- 5Y*
- 32.00%
- 10Y*
- —
MA vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -8.64% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | -1.13% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 77.75% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MA and SOXQ is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MA and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MA vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
MA
SOXQ
MA vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 7.82 | -8.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 25.87 | -26.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MA vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -46.01% | -16.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -15.92% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -39.36% | +18.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.25% | -46.01% | +17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.81% | -14.04% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -12.84% | +3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 4.80% | +6.19% |
Volatility
MA vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 7.06%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 22.01%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MA | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.06% | 22.01% | -14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.89% | 35.02% | -17.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.61% | 40.84% | -19.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 37.78% | -13.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 37.57% | -10.69% |
Dividends
MA vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than SOXQ's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.29% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MA and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (22.01%) compared to MA (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MA and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer