MA vs. QDAY.NEO

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is a stock, while QDAY.NEO (Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MA vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MA is traded in USD, while QDAY.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QDAY.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.78% return, which is significantly lower than QDAY.NEO's 27.76% return.

MA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.72%
• YTD: -13.78%
• 6M: -13.51%
• 1Y: -12.19%
• 3Y*: 9.87%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: 18.76%

QDAY.NEO

• 1D: 3.70%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 27.76%
• 6M: 29.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MA Mastercard Incorporated	-13.78%	3.90%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	27.76%	14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and QDAY.NEO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

MA vs. QDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA

MA Risk / Return Rank: 18
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

QDAY.NEO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MA	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	—	—

Drawdowns

MA vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than QDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and QDAY.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MA	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.67%	-19.01%	-43.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.71%	-1.81%	-15.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.83%	-4.74%	-5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MA	QDAY.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.46%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.90%	25.04%	-3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.02%	25.04%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	25.04%	+1.89%

Dividends

MA vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than QDAY.NEO's 14.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MA Mastercard Incorporated	0.66%	0.53%	0.50%	0.53%	0.56%	0.49%	0.45%	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.74%	0.66%
QDAY.NEO Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF	14.91%	8.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MA and QDAY.NEO in my portfolio?

MA and QDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.