MA vs. BNB-USD
MA (Mastercard Incorporated) is a stock, while BNB-USD (BNB) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 5 years, MA returned 6.66%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for BNB-USD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MA vs. BNB-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.89% return, which is significantly higher than BNB-USD's -29.49% return.
MA
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- -13.89%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- -12.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
BNB-USD
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -10.19%
- YTD
- -29.49%
- 6M
- -32.13%
- 1Y
- -7.11%
- 3Y*
- 36.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- —
MA vs. BNB-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.89% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 0.93% |
BNB-USD BNB | -29.49% | 23.21% | 124.36% | 26.83% | -51.86% | 1,277.47% | 170.06% | 126.63% | -29.71% | 320.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MA and BNB-USD is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MA vs. BNB-USD — Risk / Return Rank
MA
BNB-USD
MA vs. BNB-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and BNB (BNB-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MA | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | -0.13 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -0.20 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MA vs. BNB-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, smaller than the maximum BNB-USD drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and BNB-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MA | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -79.74% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -56.24% | +35.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -56.24% | +35.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.25% | -69.89% | +41.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.82% | -53.42% | +35.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.82% | -38.71% | +28.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 42.27% | -31.79% |
Volatility
MA vs. BNB-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.46%, while BNB (BNB-USD) has a volatility of 17.28%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNB-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MA | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 17.28% | -10.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.51% | 34.73% | -17.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 44.38% | -22.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 50.42% | -26.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 80.06% | -53.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MA and BNB-USD have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNB-USD has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to MA (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs BNB-USD's -79.74%.
BNB-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MA and BNB-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer