M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE
M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) and LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) are both China Equities funds - M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index while LHKG.DE tracks the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, M9SV.DE returned 4.62%/yr vs -2.46%/yr for LHKG.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. M9SV.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LHKG.DE.
Performance
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M9SV.DE achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly higher than LHKG.DE's -8.36% return.
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- YTD
- -8.36%
- 1Y
- -1.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.96%
- 5Y*
- -2.46%
- 10Y*
- —
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.17% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | -0.81% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -8.36% | 21.50% | 20.39% | -17.50% | -7.92% | -6.59% | -10.39% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between M9SV.DE and LHKG.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M9SV.DE
LHKG.DE
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| M9SV.DE | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.00 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.07 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | -0.15 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M9SV.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, smaller than the maximum LHKG.DE drawdown of -45.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SV.DE and LHKG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| M9SV.DE | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.79% | -45.12% | +21.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -22.44% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -26.45% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | -40.60% | +16.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.53% | -17.94% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -19.18% | +9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 11.21% | -7.98% |
Volatility
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) is 3.57%, while Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that M9SV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHKG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| M9SV.DE | LHKG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 6.84% | -3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 14.75% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 20.31% | -9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 25.02% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 23.98% | -2.50% |
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M9SV.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LHKG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
M9SV.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Dividend Comparison
M9SV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.64% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
M9SV.DE and LHKG.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index, while LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Market Access and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for M9SV.DE and 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
Find the right allocation for M9SV.DE and LHKG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer