M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE
M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, M9SV.DE returned 0.85% vs 20.24% for CHIN.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. M9SV.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, M9SV.DE achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 3.48% return.
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.17% | -5.32% | 37.47% | -4.23% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 3.48% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between M9SV.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
M9SV.DE
CHIN.DE
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| M9SV.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.20 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 2.30 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 5.60 | -5.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum M9SV.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.79%, roughly equal to the maximum CHIN.DE drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M9SV.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| M9SV.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.79% | -22.95% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -8.84% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.53% | -5.96% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -7.61% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.62% | -0.39% |
Volatility
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) is 3.57%, while KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that M9SV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| M9SV.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 7.38% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.43% | 13.49% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 18.68% | -7.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 22.48% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 22.48% | -1.00% |
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
M9SV.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
M9SV.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither M9SV.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
M9SV.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Market Access and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for M9SV.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for M9SV.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer