PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) and HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AIAA.DE
iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-8.24%5.44%-1.65%
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
-13.96%10.69%-7.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIAA.DE achieves a -8.24% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZX.DE's -13.96% return.


AIAA.DE

1D
2.03%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-3.71%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

H4ZX.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-25.69%
1Y
-18.02%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-10.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIAA.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZX.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIAA.DE
AIAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZX.DE
H4ZX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) and HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIAA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

-0.63

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

-0.75

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.91

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

-0.59

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

-1.30

+1.54

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIAA.DE and H4ZX.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIAA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

-0.63

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.23

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between AIAA.DE and H4ZX.DE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AIAA.DE nor H4ZX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum H4ZX.DE drawdown of -69.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIAA.DE and H4ZX.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AIAA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-69.32%

+44.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.39%

-28.90%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.89%

-54.21%

+43.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-49.39%

+42.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

13.07%

-9.05%

Volatility

AIAA.DE vs. H4ZX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares AI Adopters & Applications UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AIAA.DE) is 4.97%, while HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that AIAA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AIAA.DEH4ZX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

8.03%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

18.35%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

28.59%

-10.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.77%

37.64%

-19.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

37.86%

-20.09%