PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
M12.DE vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

M12.DE vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in M1 Kliniken AG (M12.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

M12.DE is traded in EUR, while ASML is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASML values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, M12.DE achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 67.85% return. Over the past 10 years, M12.DE has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 11.34%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 33.07% annualized return.


M12.DE

1D
-1.42%
1M
8.89%
6M
11.26%
YTD
1.89%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
37.38%
5Y*
16.02%
10Y*
11.34%
ALL TIME*
15.85%

ASML

1D
-0.28%
1M
-9.51%
6M
30.53%
YTD
67.85%
1Y
142.93%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*
33.07%
ALL TIME*
29.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

M12.DE vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
M12.DE
M1 Kliniken AG
1.89%18.52%52.59%23.62%20.80%-18.83%-35.38%-2.24%15.86%29.02%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
67.85%37.93%-1.61%35.71%-26.18%76.41%52.37%97.94%-5.56%37.03%

Correlation

The correlation between M12.DE and ASML is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2015

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

M12.DE vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

M12.DE
M12.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
M12.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
M12.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
M12.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
M12.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
M12.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

M12.DE vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for M1 Kliniken AG (M12.DE) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


M12.DEASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

9.36

-8.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

27.14

-23.95

M12.DE vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current M12.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of M12.DE and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

M12.DE vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum M12.DE drawdown since its inception was -77.71%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for M12.DE and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


M12.DEASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.71%

-58.22%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.85%

-15.36%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.59%

-46.09%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.93%

-49.06%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.71%

-49.06%

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-12.54%

+6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.46%

-13.96%

-14.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.81%

5.31%

+5.50%

Volatility

M12.DE vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for M1 Kliniken AG (M12.DE) is 15.86%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.21%. This indicates that M12.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


M12.DEASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.86%

17.21%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.48%

34.64%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.53%

43.99%

+2.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.62%

41.64%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.08%

38.19%

+7.89%

Dividends

M12.DE vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

M12.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, more than ASML's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.51%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
M12.DE
M1 Kliniken AG
6.63%2.63%3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.10%2.00%2.28%2.84%0.00%

Financials

M12.DE vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between M1 Kliniken AG and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


M12.DE and ASML have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for M12.DE and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer