LZUSX vs. LGI
LZUSX (Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio) and LGI (Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LZUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard, while LGI is a Global Allocation fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZUSX returned 13.07%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for LGI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZUSX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for LGI.
Performance
LZUSX vs. LGI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZUSX achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly lower than LGI's 9.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LZUSX has underperformed LGI with an annualized return of 13.07%, while LGI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.
LZUSX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
LGI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 9.38%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
LZUSX vs. LGI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio | 3.84% | 15.23% | 14.20% | 19.79% | -16.97% | 27.40% | 17.28% | 31.71% | -3.36% | 18.18% |
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund | 9.38% | 21.36% | 14.00% | 12.89% | -20.57% | 25.28% | 17.04% | 30.25% | -10.51% | 39.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZUSX and LGI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LZUSX and LGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZUSX vs. LGI — Risk / Return Rank
LZUSX
LGI
LZUSX vs. LGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) and Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZUSX | LGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.02 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.73 | 3.61 | +3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZUSX vs. LGI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZUSX drawdown since its inception was -55.40%, smaller than the maximum LGI drawdown of -63.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZUSX and LGI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZUSX | LGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.40% | -63.34% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -21.25% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.18% | -21.95% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.05% | -32.84% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -42.94% | +7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -5.48% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -10.93% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.97% | -3.47% |
Volatility
LZUSX vs. LGI - Volatility Comparison
Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio (LZUSX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund (LGI) at 3.73%. This indicates that LZUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZUSX | LGI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.73% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.86% | 14.39% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 16.28% | -4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 19.32% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 20.02% | -2.35% |
LZUSX vs. LGI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZUSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LGI's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZUSX vs. LGI - Dividend Comparison
LZUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than LGI's 9.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGI Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund | 9.94% | 10.08% | 9.19% | 7.32% | 10.22% | 9.77% | 7.17% | 6.44% | 19.88% | 5.46% | 6.94% | 8.52% |
LZUSX Lazard US Equity Focus Portfolio | 13.30% | 13.81% | 6.61% | 1.09% | 2.77% | 5.78% | 5.28% | 11.94% | 17.57% | 10.34% | 3.41% | 7.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZUSX and LGI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZUSX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to LGI (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZUSX dropped -55.40% vs LGI's -63.34%.
LZUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZUSX and LGI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer