LZSIX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LZSIX (Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZSIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard, while LZEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZSIX returned 6.86%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for LZEMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LZSIX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 (LZSIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZSIX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 26.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LZSIX has underperformed LZEMX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while LZEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.13% annualized return.

LZSIX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 13.42%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

LZEMX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 7.95%
• YTD: 26.96%
• 6M: 29.16%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 29.23%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZSIX Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6	13.42%	24.70%	2.11%	12.08%	-15.56%	3.27%	8.33%	20.32%	-14.54%	28.31%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	26.96%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	-18.11%	28.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LZSIX and LZEMX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001	0.77

The correlation between LZSIX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LZSIX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZSIX

LZSIX Risk / Return Rank: 35
LZSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LZSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
LZSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LZSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LZSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 96
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 (LZSIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LZSIX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	4.35	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	5.54	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.81	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	5.58	-3.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.27	20.53	-12.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZSIX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LZSIX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	4.35	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.94	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.68	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.41	-0.15

Drawdowns

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZSIX drawdown since its inception was -55.86%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSIX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZSIX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.86%	-60.08%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.29%	-10.42%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.40%	-14.27%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.56%	-30.55%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.77%	-44.08%	+7.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.71%	-16.63%	+4.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	2.83%	+0.11%

Volatility

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6 (LZSIX) is 4.56%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that LZSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZSIX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	5.21%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	10.95%	+0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.01%	13.37%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	14.32%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	16.39%	-0.56%

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZSIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZSIX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

LZSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than LZEMX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.61%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%
LZSIX Lazard International Equity Select Portfolio R6	2.20%	2.50%	1.74%	1.48%	2.22%	3.39%	0.98%	2.18%	3.22%	0.66%	1.15%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZSIX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

LZSIX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LZSIX or LZEMX?

LZEMX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to LZSIX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSIX dropped -55.86% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.