PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZSCX vs. VSTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZSCX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly lower than VSTCX's 18.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX has underperformed VSTCX with an annualized return of 8.98%, while VSTCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


LZSCX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.87%
YTD
16.82%
6M
16.43%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
8.98%

VSTCX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.68%
YTD
18.22%
6M
18.42%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZSCX
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6
16.82%2.46%13.77%10.16%-15.20%20.08%6.43%30.01%-13.49%14.25%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.22%15.20%15.40%21.34%-13.00%33.53%8.38%22.18%-11.87%9.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LZSCX and VSTCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2006

0.96

The correlation between LZSCX and VSTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZSCX vs. VSTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZSCX
LZSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LZSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LZSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VSTCX
VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZSCXVSTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

5.44

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

19.17

-8.75

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VSTCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZSCX and VSTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZSCXVSTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.50

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.54

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.54

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.38

+0.09

Drawdowns

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZSCX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, smaller than the maximum VSTCX drawdown of -62.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSCX and VSTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZSCXVSTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.08%

-62.50%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-8.08%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.89%

-27.47%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-27.47%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-48.08%

+4.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-10.65%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.29%

+1.02%

Volatility

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) at 4.49%. This indicates that LZSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZSCXVSTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.49%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

11.97%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

17.57%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

21.99%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.40%

23.47%

-1.07%

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VSTCX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZSCX vs. VSTCX - Dividend Comparison

LZSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than VSTCX's 6.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZSCX
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6
4.26%4.98%17.48%8.00%4.28%15.21%0.57%3.22%17.28%12.69%2.37%6.80%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
6.38%7.55%9.66%2.50%7.44%19.92%1.24%4.14%11.74%5.76%1.35%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, LZSCX and VSTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LZSCX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to VSTCX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSCX dropped -58.08% vs VSTCX's -62.50%.

VSTCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZSCX and VSTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer