LZSCX vs. DFSCX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LZSCX (Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6) and DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX returned 9.95%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for DFSCX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LZSCX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DFSCX.

Performance

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZSCX achieves a 22.32% return, which is significantly higher than DFSCX's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX has underperformed DFSCX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while DFSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.

LZSCX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 6.90%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 20.15%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

DFSCX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 20.66%
• 6M: 18.44%
• 1Y: 38.20%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 9.96%
• 10Y*: 11.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6	22.32%	2.46%	13.77%	10.16%	-15.20%	20.08%	6.43%	30.01%	-13.49%	14.25%
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	20.66%	9.65%	11.43%	17.93%	-12.49%	33.70%	6.61%	20.68%	-11.60%	10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between LZSCX and DFSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 1991	0.91

The correlation between LZSCX and DFSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LZSCX vs. DFSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZSCX

LZSCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
LZSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LZSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LZSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LZSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LZSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

DFSCX

DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 78
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LZSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.28	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.28	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	4.95	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	16.06	-4.14

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the DFSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZSCX and DFSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZSCX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, smaller than the maximum DFSCX drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSCX and DFSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LZSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.08%	-63.07%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.49%	-8.17%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.89%	-27.01%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	-27.01%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.64%	-46.88%	+3.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-9.89%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	2.51%	+0.79%

Volatility

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) at 4.54%. This indicates that LZSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LZSCX	DFSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	4.54%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	11.91%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.82%	17.75%	+3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	21.00%	+1.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.47%	22.66%	-0.19%

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSCX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZSCX vs. DFSCX - Dividend Comparison

LZSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than DFSCX's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	0.79%	1.03%	0.97%	2.48%	5.16%	10.77%	0.87%	2.80%	5.50%	5.05%	0.90%	6.33%
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6	4.07%	4.98%	17.48%	8.00%	4.28%	15.21%	0.57%	3.22%	17.28%	12.69%	2.37%	6.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZSCX and DFSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, LZSCX and DFSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LZSCX or DFSCX?

LZSCX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to DFSCX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSCX dropped -58.08% vs DFSCX's -63.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.