LZSCX vs. UMNIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LZSCX (Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6) and UMNIX (Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard, while UMNIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lazard. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LZSCX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for UMNIX.

Performance

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LZSCX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 6.90%
• YTD: 22.32%
• 6M: 20.15%
• 1Y: 37.14%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

UMNIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6	22.32%	2.46%	13.77%	10.16%	-15.20%	20.08%	6.43%	30.01%	-13.49%	14.25%
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio	0.22%	5.02%	3.88%	3.53%	-2.72%	-0.44%	2.47%	3.26%	1.09%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2011	-0.05

The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LZSCX vs. UMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZSCX

LZSCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
LZSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LZSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LZSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LZSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LZSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

UMNIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LZSCX	UMNIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LZSCX	UMNIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LZSCX	UMNIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.82%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.47%	—	—

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than UMNIX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Dividend Comparison

LZSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than UMNIX's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6	4.07%	4.98%	17.48%	8.00%	4.28%	15.21%	0.57%	3.22%	17.28%	12.69%	2.37%	6.80%
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio	2.96%	3.94%	3.48%	2.70%	1.30%	0.16%	1.22%	2.48%	2.00%	1.53%	1.30%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LZSCX and UMNIX in my portfolio?

LZSCX and UMNIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.