LZSCX vs. UMNIX
LZSCX (Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6) and UMNIX (Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio) are both mutual funds - LZSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Lazard, while UMNIX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX returned 8.98%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for UMNIX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LZSCX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for UMNIX.
Performance
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZSCX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly higher than UMNIX's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX has outperformed UMNIX with an annualized return of 8.98%, while UMNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.
LZSCX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 16.82%
- 6M
- 16.43%
- 1Y
- 32.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
UMNIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 | 16.82% | 2.46% | 13.77% | 10.16% | -15.20% | 20.08% | 6.43% | 30.01% | -13.49% | 14.25% |
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.22% | 5.02% | 3.88% | 3.53% | -2.72% | -0.44% | 2.47% | 3.26% | 1.09% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2011 | -0.05 |
The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZSCX vs. UMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
LZSCX
UMNIX
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZSCX | UMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.00 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.42 | 9.84 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZSCX | UMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.75 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.96 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 1.14 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.01 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZSCX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, which is greater than UMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSCX and UMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZSCX | UMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.08% | -4.13% | -53.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -1.04% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.89% | -1.04% | -28.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.89% | -4.00% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -4.13% | -39.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.38% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.04% | -0.85% | -8.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 0.32% | +2.99% |
Volatility
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that LZSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZSCX | UMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 0.53% | +5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 1.15% | +13.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.31% | 1.78% | +18.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 1.96% | +20.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 1.54% | +20.86% |
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than UMNIX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Dividend Comparison
LZSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than UMNIX's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZSCX Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 | 4.26% | 4.98% | 17.48% | 8.00% | 4.28% | 15.21% | 0.57% | 3.22% | 17.28% | 12.69% | 2.37% | 6.80% |
UMNIX Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.96% | 3.94% | 3.48% | 2.70% | 1.30% | 0.16% | 1.22% | 2.48% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.30% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZSCX and UMNIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZSCX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to UMNIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSCX dropped -58.08% vs UMNIX's -4.13%.
UMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZSCX and UMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer