PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZSCX vs. UMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZSCX achieves a 16.82% return, which is significantly higher than UMNIX's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LZSCX has outperformed UMNIX with an annualized return of 8.98%, while UMNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.


LZSCX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.87%
YTD
16.82%
6M
16.43%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
14.29%
5Y*
5.23%
10Y*
8.98%

UMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.41%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZSCX
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6
16.82%2.46%13.77%10.16%-15.20%20.08%6.43%30.01%-13.49%14.25%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
0.22%5.02%3.88%3.53%-2.72%-0.44%2.47%3.26%1.09%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2011

-0.05

The correlation between LZSCX and UMNIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZSCX vs. UMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZSCX
LZSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LZSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LZSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

UMNIX
UMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) and Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZSCXUMNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.00

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.42

9.84

+0.58

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the UMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZSCX and UMNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZSCXUMNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.96

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

1.14

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.01

-0.54

Drawdowns

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZSCX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, which is greater than UMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZSCX and UMNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZSCXUMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.08%

-4.13%

-53.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-1.04%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.89%

-1.04%

-28.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-4.00%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-4.13%

-39.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.38%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-0.85%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

0.32%

+2.99%

Volatility

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6 (LZSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio (UMNIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that LZSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZSCXUMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

0.53%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

1.15%

+13.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.31%

1.78%

+18.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.64%

1.96%

+20.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.40%

1.54%

+20.86%

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZSCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than UMNIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZSCX vs. UMNIX - Dividend Comparison

LZSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than UMNIX's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZSCX
Lazard US Small-Mid Cap Equity Portfolio R6
4.26%4.98%17.48%8.00%4.28%15.21%0.57%3.22%17.28%12.69%2.37%6.80%
UMNIX
Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio
2.96%3.94%3.48%2.70%1.30%0.16%1.22%2.48%2.00%1.53%1.30%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZSCX and UMNIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZSCX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to UMNIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZSCX dropped -58.08% vs UMNIX's -4.13%.

UMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZSCX and UMNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer