PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZISX vs. YASLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZISX vs. YASLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZISX achieves a 28.42% return, which is significantly higher than YASLX's 17.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LZISX has underperformed YASLX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while YASLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


LZISX

1D
0.97%
1M
5.51%
YTD
28.42%
6M
29.66%
1Y
43.35%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
7.83%

YASLX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.60%
6M
16.00%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZISX vs. YASLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
28.42%35.95%-3.68%11.59%-26.34%12.36%13.45%25.49%-24.90%36.67%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
17.60%6.27%11.23%3.65%-13.59%24.45%12.82%17.07%-10.15%34.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LZISX and YASLX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.66

The correlation between LZISX and YASLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZISX vs. YASLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZISX
LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

YASLX
YASLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
YASLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YASLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
YASLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
YASLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YASLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZISX vs. YASLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LZISXYASLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

1.72

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.97

2.34

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.85

+1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.65

5.29

+8.36

LZISX vs. YASLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the YASLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZISX and YASLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LZISXYASLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.72

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.27

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.76

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.62

-0.18

Drawdowns

LZISX vs. YASLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZISX drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than YASLX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZISX and YASLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZISXYASLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.43%

-38.91%

-26.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-10.18%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-16.65%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-27.74%

-14.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

-38.91%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-8.22%

-6.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.54%

-0.44%

Volatility

LZISX vs. YASLX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund (YASLX) at 2.62%. This indicates that LZISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YASLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZISXYASLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

2.62%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.49%

8.58%

+6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

10.99%

+8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

16.32%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

15.03%

+2.03%

LZISX vs. YASLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZISX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than YASLX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZISX vs. YASLX - Dividend Comparison

LZISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while YASLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
1.49%1.91%1.89%2.08%5.44%36.78%2.07%2.10%4.62%0.00%2.96%0.69%
YASLX
AMG Yacktman Special Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%15.82%8.97%0.94%3.85%2.62%12.95%9.89%4.86%3.28%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


LZISX and YASLX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LZISX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to YASLX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZISX dropped -65.43% vs YASLX's -38.91%.

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZISX and YASLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer