LZISX vs. DRIOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX).
LZISX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Nov 30, 1993. DRIOX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Sep 16, 2007.
Performance
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 5.19% | 35.95% | -3.68% | 11.59% | -26.34% | 12.36% | 13.45% | 25.49% | -24.90% | 36.67% |
DRIOX Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund | -2.45% | 28.93% | 3.15% | 11.96% | -24.37% | 12.44% | 29.84% | 30.41% | -17.03% | 41.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZISX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than DRIOX's -2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, LZISX has underperformed DRIOX with an annualized return of 5.94%, while DRIOX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.93% annualized return.
LZISX
- 1D
- 4.31%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
DRIOX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- -2.45%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 25.64%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZISX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIOX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LZISX vs. DRIOX — Risk / Return Rank
LZISX
DRIOX
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) and Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZISX | DRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 1.46 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | 1.98 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.55 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.49 | 6.05 | +5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZISX | DRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 1.46 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.13 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between LZISX and DRIOX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Dividend Comparison
LZISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than DRIOX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZISX Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio | 1.82% | 1.91% | 1.89% | 2.08% | 5.44% | 36.78% | 2.07% | 2.10% | 4.62% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 0.69% |
DRIOX Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.09% | 1.06% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 5.94% | 27.01% | 8.26% | 0.77% | 16.19% | 15.63% | 0.00% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZISX drawdown since its inception was -65.43%, which is greater than DRIOX's maximum drawdown of -59.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZISX and DRIOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZISX | DRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.43% | -59.68% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -14.47% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.01% | -47.73% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | -47.73% | +2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.31% | -11.78% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -15.41% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.70% | -0.65% |
Volatility
LZISX vs. DRIOX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund (DRIOX) at 8.35%. This indicates that LZISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LZISX | DRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 8.35% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 12.46% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 17.80% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 23.71% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 20.78% | -3.91% |