LZHYX vs. PRFRX
LZHYX (Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio) and PRFRX (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, LZHYX returned 4.10%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for PRFRX. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LZHYX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRFRX.
Performance
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZHYX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than PRFRX's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LZHYX has underperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.39% annualized return.
LZHYX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 5.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.15%
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZHYX Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio | 1.17% | 10.49% | 5.34% | 10.22% | -10.18% | 2.53% | 4.88% | 13.36% | -2.71% | 5.39% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class | 1.84% | 7.78% | 16.63% | 20.66% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZHYX and PRFRX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011 | 0.51 |
The correlation between LZHYX and PRFRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZHYX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
LZHYX
PRFRX
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LZHYX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.63 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 3.02 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 10.89 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZHYX drawdown since its inception was -32.30%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZHYX and PRFRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZHYX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -20.05% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.28% | -1.50% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.67% | -2.07% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.43% | -5.94% | -8.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.80% | -20.05% | +2.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.22% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -0.68% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.42% | +0.07% |
Volatility
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio (LZHYX) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class (PRFRX) at 0.30%. This indicates that LZHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZHYX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.30% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 1.78% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 2.44% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 3.15% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 4.00% | +1.06% |
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LZHYX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than PRFRX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
LZHYX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
LZHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than PRFRX's 6.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZHYX Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio | 4.75% | 5.49% | 5.07% | 3.87% | 4.19% | 3.37% | 3.98% | 4.42% | 4.85% | 4.84% | 4.70% | 5.20% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund - Investor Class | 6.76% | 8.11% | 15.09% | 15.33% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZHYX and PRFRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZHYX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to PRFRX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZHYX dropped -32.30% vs PRFRX's -20.05%.
LZHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZHYX and PRFRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer