PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LZEMX vs. LEAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LZEMX achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly lower than LEAIX's 26.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LZEMX has underperformed LEAIX with an annualized return of 10.86%, while LEAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


LZEMX

1D
-2.67%
1M
0.90%
YTD
22.13%
6M
22.97%
1Y
44.62%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
10.86%

LEAIX

1D
-4.67%
1M
2.43%
YTD
26.52%
6M
26.84%
1Y
46.71%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
22.13%41.35%7.60%22.44%-14.86%5.37%-0.07%18.06%-18.11%28.02%
LEAIX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio
26.52%33.74%11.41%12.67%-21.01%0.96%17.39%20.44%-16.25%42.52%

Correlation

The correlation between LZEMX and LEAIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.91

The correlation between LZEMX and LEAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LZEMX vs. LEAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LZEMX
LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAIX
LEAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LEAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LZEMXLEAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.50

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.82

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.55

14.34

+2.20

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LZEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is comparable to the LEAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LZEMX and LEAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LZEMX drawdown since its inception was -60.08%, which is greater than LEAIX's maximum drawdown of -37.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZEMX and LEAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LZEMXLEAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.08%

-37.24%

-22.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-13.29%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-16.21%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-36.30%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-37.24%

-6.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

-4.67%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-11.47%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.53%

-0.62%

Volatility

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) is 6.12%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio (LEAIX) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that LZEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LZEMXLEAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

9.85%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

16.36%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

18.52%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

16.54%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

17.60%

-1.23%

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LZEMX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than LEAIX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

LZEMX vs. LEAIX - Dividend Comparison

LZEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than LEAIX's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEAIX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Advantage Portfolio
1.51%1.90%1.52%1.93%3.42%8.01%0.84%1.92%2.43%1.15%1.62%0.00%
LZEMX
Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
1.68%2.05%3.11%3.76%5.92%4.89%2.11%2.45%2.10%1.99%1.48%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LZEMX and LEAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LEAIX has higher volatility (9.85%) compared to LZEMX (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZEMX dropped -60.08% vs LEAIX's -37.24%.

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LZEMX and LEAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer