PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMIX vs. HLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMIX achieves a 112.88% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMIX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 21.80%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


DEMIX

1D
2.49%
1M
25.82%
YTD
112.88%
6M
130.33%
1Y
253.23%
3Y*
66.83%
5Y*
26.08%
10Y*
21.80%

HLFMX

1D
0.66%
1M
0.22%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.93%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
112.88%86.79%6.52%17.59%-28.66%-2.08%26.09%24.33%-17.10%41.98%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
2.80%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMIX and HLFMX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2008

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between DEMIX and HLFMX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMIX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMIX
DEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMIXHLFMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.75

1.18

+5.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.52

1.81

+3.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

1.23

+0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.33

1.25

+11.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

46.85

3.51

+43.34

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 6.75, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMIX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMIXHLFMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.75

1.18

+5.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.40

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.33

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.08

+0.46

Drawdowns

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMIX drawdown since its inception was -63.15%, roughly equal to the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMIX and HLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMIXHLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.15%

-63.95%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.01%

-11.09%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.62%

-11.79%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.95%

-28.37%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-46.61%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.61%

+6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.46%

-19.26%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

3.93%

+1.58%

Volatility

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a higher volatility of 17.10% compared to Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) at 3.67%. This indicates that DEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMIXHLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

3.67%

+13.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.83%

10.19%

+23.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.39%

11.76%

+26.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

10.48%

+14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

11.91%

+11.23%

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMIX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

DEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than HLFMX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
8.91%18.97%1.99%2.95%1.89%3.42%0.87%0.80%0.65%1.80%0.94%0.30%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.47%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMIX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMIX has higher volatility (17.10%) compared to HLFMX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMIX dropped -63.15% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

DEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.75 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMIX and HLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer