PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Acc (LYY7.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYY7.DE achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than XESC.DE's 7.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LYY7.DE has underperformed XESC.DE with an annualized return of 8.86%, while XESC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.49% annualized return.


LYY7.DE

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
1.32%
6M
3.35%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
8.86%

XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
1.88%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.62%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYY7.DE
Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Acc
1.32%22.58%18.16%19.56%-12.88%15.21%3.01%24.70%-18.55%12.11%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%-2.88%30.09%-12.09%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LYY7.DE and XESC.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2008

0.93

The correlation between LYY7.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY7.DE
LYY7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LYY7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Acc (LYY7.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYY7.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.18

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.45

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

4.94

-4.38

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY7.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYY7.DEXESC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

0.98

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.32

+0.03

Drawdowns

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY7.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.24%, which is greater than XESC.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY7.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYY7.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.24%

-45.38%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-10.88%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-16.53%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-23.33%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.74%

-38.51%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-0.53%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-8.39%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

3.19%

+0.80%

Volatility

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Acc (LYY7.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) have volatilities of 5.09% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYY7.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

4.90%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

13.02%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

16.01%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

17.54%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

18.27%

+0.08%

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY7.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYY7.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYY7.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYY7.DE
Amundi Dax III UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LYY7.DE and XESC.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LYY7.DE.

LYY7.DE tracks DAX®, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LYY7.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYY7.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer