PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYY4.DE achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly lower than XDNE.DE's 16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LYY4.DE has underperformed XDNE.DE with an annualized return of 8.15%, while XDNE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


LYY4.DE

1D
-2.17%
1M
-2.80%
6M
7.39%
YTD
14.34%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
8.15%

XDNE.DE

1D
-2.56%
1M
-4.37%
6M
9.10%
YTD
16.11%
1Y
41.96%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
18.26%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
14.34%13.10%12.42%15.45%-11.19%8.61%3.15%20.96%-11.07%10.82%
XDNE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
16.11%25.99%21.86%32.65%-6.33%11.20%6.98%17.57%-17.40%19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.83

The correlation between LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XDNE.DE
XDNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYY4.DEXDNE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.19

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

13.97

-3.64

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the XDNE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYY4.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.07%, which is greater than XDNE.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYY4.DEXDNE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.07%

-35.20%

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.96%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-21.73%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-21.73%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.62%

-35.20%

+6.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-6.51%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.28%

-8.27%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.00%

-0.07%

Volatility

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) is 5.79%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDNE.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that LYY4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDNE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYY4.DEXDNE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

7.16%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

16.76%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.58%

21.07%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

18.73%

-2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

18.49%

-2.23%

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYY4.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNE.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYY4.DE vs. XDNE.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYY4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while XDNE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.62%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.89%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%
XDNE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDNE.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®, while XDNE.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Screened Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LYY4.DE and 0.25% for XDNE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYY4.DE and XDNE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer