PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than UIQK.DE's 22.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LYTR.DE having a 9.05% annualized return and UIQK.DE not far behind at 8.63%.


LYTR.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.45%
YTD
31.68%
6M
37.89%
1Y
63.68%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
9.05%

UIQK.DE

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.24%
YTD
22.10%
6M
22.34%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYTR.DE
Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc
31.68%17.61%13.31%-15.11%27.05%52.41%-19.51%14.38%-6.19%-11.98%
UIQK.DE
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
22.10%-1.67%10.72%-4.23%22.43%46.71%-8.90%12.48%-6.36%-6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2013

0.88

The correlation between LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYTR.DE
LYTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LYTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

UIQK.DE
UIQK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UIQK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIQK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYTR.DEUIQK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

1.81

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.93

3.75

+13.18

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYTR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the UIQK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYTR.DEUIQK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

1.11

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.70

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.54

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.28

-0.16

Drawdowns

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than UIQK.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYTR.DEUIQK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.69%

-40.58%

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-15.84%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-15.84%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.29%

-17.37%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.60%

-30.72%

-13.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-3.23%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-14.71%

-16.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

7.66%

-3.83%

Volatility

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UIQK.DE) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYTR.DEUIQK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

5.01%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

12.05%

+8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.94%

25.76%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

17.74%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

15.90%

+2.30%

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UIQK.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYTR.DE vs. UIQK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYTR.DE nor UIQK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UIQK.DE.

LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while UIQK.DE tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYTR.DE and 0.34% for UIQK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and UIQK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer