LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE
LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) and ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted while ETLF.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYTR.DE returned 17.81%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for ETLF.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYTR.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETLF.DE.
Performance
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than ETLF.DE's 23.78% return.
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 63.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
ETLF.DE
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 31.68% | 17.61% | 13.31% | -15.11% | 27.05% | 52.41% | -19.51% | 14.38% | -6.19% | 4.29% |
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 23.78% | 4.67% | 10.97% | -10.24% | 21.51% | 40.15% | -13.51% | 9.35% | -5.45% | 2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTR.DE and ETLF.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LYTR.DE and ETLF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYTR.DE
ETLF.DE
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYTR.DE | ETLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.34 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 3.96 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 8.79 | +8.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYTR.DE | ETLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 1.86 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.71 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.53 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than ETLF.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and ETLF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYTR.DE | ETLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -28.78% | -38.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -8.80% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -15.96% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.29% | -27.00% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -4.91% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -12.13% | -19.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 3.97% | -0.14% |
Volatility
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) is 5.20%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that LYTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYTR.DE | ETLF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.93% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 16.60% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 18.79% | +4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 17.09% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 15.59% | +2.61% |
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYTR.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYTR.DE nor ETLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, LYTR.DE and ETLF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYTR.DE and 0.15% for ETLF.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and ETLF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer