LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE
LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) and EMEH.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) are both Commodities funds - LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted while EMEH.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYTR.DE returned 17.81%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for EMEH.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYTR.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMEH.DE.
Performance
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than EMEH.DE's 21.33% return.
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 63.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
EMEH.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 43.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 31.68% | 17.61% | 13.31% | -15.11% | 27.05% | 52.41% | -19.51% | 14.38% | -6.19% | 3.70% |
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 21.33% | 25.40% | 6.63% | -12.26% | 11.15% | 27.11% | -4.42% | 7.62% | -90.10% | 4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTR.DE and EMEH.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LYTR.DE and EMEH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYTR.DE
EMEH.DE
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYTR.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.45 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 4.95 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 14.34 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYTR.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.47 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.64 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | -0.48 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum EMEH.DE drawdown of -92.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and EMEH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYTR.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -92.42% | +24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -8.89% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -12.28% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.29% | -32.73% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -80.34% | +76.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -81.38% | +50.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 3.08% | +0.75% |
Volatility
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE) at 4.15%. This indicates that LYTR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYTR.DE | EMEH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 4.15% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 15.95% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 17.83% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 17.50% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 34.16% | -15.96% |
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYTR.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYTR.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, LYTR.DE and EMEH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while EMEH.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYTR.DE and 0.39% for EMEH.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and EMEH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer