LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE
LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) and C099.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both Commodities funds from Amundi - LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted while C099.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LYTR.DE returned 20.31%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for C099.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LYTR.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for C099.DE.
Performance
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly higher than C099.DE's 28.92% return.
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 63.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
C099.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 28.92%
- 6M
- 36.32%
- 1Y
- 62.17%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 31.68% | 17.61% | 13.31% | -9.67% |
C099.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 28.92% | 29.62% | 4.85% | -8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTR.DE and C099.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between LYTR.DE and C099.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYTR.DE
C099.DE
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYTR.DE | C099.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 5.06 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.93 | 17.91 | -0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYTR.DE | C099.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 2.92 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.85 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, which is greater than C099.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and C099.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYTR.DE | C099.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -15.35% | -52.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -12.55% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -15.35% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -4.74% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -6.21% | -25.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 3.55% | +0.28% |
Volatility
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) have volatilities of 5.20% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYTR.DE | C099.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.09% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.33% | 19.66% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.94% | 21.77% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 17.90% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 17.90% | +0.30% |
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than C099.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYTR.DE vs. C099.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYTR.DE nor C099.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, LYTR.DE and C099.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for C099.DE.
LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while C099.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYTR.DE and 0.35% for C099.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and C099.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer