PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPS.DE achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7C.DE's 13.30% return.


LYPS.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.38%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.66%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.17%

2B7C.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.50%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.11%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
11.42%4.89%32.52%22.69%-14.10%40.92%7.06%34.95%-1.02%4.27%
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
13.30%6.91%23.72%13.89%-0.20%32.19%-0.63%32.20%-10.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.80

The correlation between LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPS.DE
LYPS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7C.DE
2B7C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPS.DE2B7C.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.26

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.34

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

7.59

+5.25

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the 2B7C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPS.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.44

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.60

+0.37

Drawdowns

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPS.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.81%, smaller than the maximum 2B7C.DE drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPS.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-41.33%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-8.89%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-22.66%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-22.66%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.47%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-5.04%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.75%

-0.75%

Volatility

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) is 2.63%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7C.DE) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that LYPS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPS.DE2B7C.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

3.74%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

10.98%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

14.45%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.73%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

19.35%

-3.25%

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPS.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LYPS.DE vs. 2B7C.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYPS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while 2B7C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2B7C.DE
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYPS.DE
Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.90%1.00%1.21%1.04%2.11%1.09%1.54%1.63%1.93%1.75%1.88%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.

LYPS.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7C.DE is Industrials Equities. LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 2B7C.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYPS.DE and 0.15% for 2B7C.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPS.DE and 2B7C.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer