PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYPG.DE is traded in EUR, while GXLK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLK.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 19.31% return, which is significantly higher than GXLK.L's 17.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed GXLK.L with an annualized return of 22.32%, while GXLK.L has yielded a comparatively lower 19.09% annualized return.


LYPG.DE

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.19%
6M
21.25%
YTD
19.31%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
18.41%
10Y*
22.32%
ALL TIME*
20.10%

GXLK.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.08%
6M
19.56%
YTD
17.23%
1Y
29.98%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
19.09%
ALL TIME*
16.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
19.31%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
17.23%9.84%30.75%51.46%-43.80%42.94%35.59%59.14%-3.02%28.62%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and GXLK.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, LYPG.DE and GXLK.L have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYPG.DEGXLK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.91

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

4.68

+0.33

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and GXLK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, smaller than the maximum GXLK.L drawdown of -44.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and GXLK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DEGXLK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-44.73%

+12.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-15.74%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-30.29%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-44.73%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

-44.73%

+12.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-8.58%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-10.29%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.28%

6.42%

-0.14%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) have volatilities of 7.51% and 7.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DEGXLK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.51%

7.48%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

16.51%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

21.80%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

25.12%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

25.61%

-4.04%

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLK.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. GXLK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYPG.DE nor GXLK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LYPG.DE and GXLK.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while GXLK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.15% for GXLK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and GXLK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer