PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYPG.DE achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LYPG.DE has outperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 23.74%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 21.42% annualized return.


LYPG.DE

1D
-2.08%
1M
12.62%
YTD
25.00%
6M
23.20%
1Y
47.39%
3Y*
28.91%
5Y*
22.18%
10Y*
23.74%

6AQQ.DE

1D
-0.84%
1M
7.97%
YTD
20.65%
6M
18.79%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
21.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYPG.DE
Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc
25.00%9.20%41.03%49.19%-28.32%41.72%30.66%51.20%0.61%20.65%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
20.65%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.22%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.93

The correlation between LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYPG.DE
LYPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYPG.DE6AQQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.77

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

11.17

-2.99

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYPG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYPG.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.41

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.94

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.08

-0.06

Drawdowns

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYPG.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, roughly equal to the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYPG.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.83%

-31.19%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-10.01%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-26.73%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

-31.19%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.83%

-31.19%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-0.84%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-5.36%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

3.39%

+2.52%

Volatility

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYPG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that LYPG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYPG.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

4.40%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

10.96%

+4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

15.66%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

19.83%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

19.63%

+1.82%

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYPG.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYPG.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYPG.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYPG.DE.

LYPG.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. LYPG.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYPG.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYPG.DE and 6AQQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer