LYMZ.DE vs. INTU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LYMZ.DE (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Daily Leverage Index, while INTU (Intuit Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE returned 15.82%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for INTU. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while INTU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INTU values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMZ.DE achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than INTU's -54.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE has outperformed INTU with an annualized return of 15.82%, while INTU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.29% annualized return.

LYMZ.DE

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 3.24%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 25.17%
• 5Y*: 17.14%
• 10Y*: 15.82%

INTU

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -22.12%
• YTD: -54.10%
• 6M: -55.26%
• 1Y: -61.23%
• 3Y*: -14.40%
• 5Y*: -6.85%
• 10Y*: 11.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF	11.52%	39.84%	15.21%	41.48%	-21.87%	49.32%	-15.91%	64.99%	-24.78%	18.73%
INTU Intuit Inc.	-54.10%	-6.50%	7.83%	56.91%	-35.35%	83.00%	34.08%	37.14%	31.77%	22.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMZ.DE and INTU is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.28

The correlation between LYMZ.DE and INTU shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMZ.DE

LYMZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 26
LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LYMZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LYMZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LYMZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LYMZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

INTU

INTU Risk / Return Rank: 2
INTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
INTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
INTU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
INTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
INTU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Intuit Inc. (INTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYMZ.DE	INTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	-1.38	+2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	-2.25	+3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.70	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	-0.97	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.96	-1.81	+5.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the INTU Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMZ.DE and INTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYMZ.DE	INTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82	-1.38	+2.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.18	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.33	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.49	-0.39

Drawdowns

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than INTU's maximum drawdown of -63.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and INTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYMZ.DE	INTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.31%	-63.38%	-20.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.17%	-63.38%	+42.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.42%	-63.38%	+31.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.28%	-63.38%	+19.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.87%	-63.38%	-0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-63.38%	+62.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.16%	-10.56%	-29.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.63%	33.88%	-27.25%

Volatility

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) is 9.89%, while Intuit Inc. (INTU) has a volatility of 28.92%. This indicates that LYMZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYMZ.DE	INTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	28.92%	-19.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.73%	42.68%	-16.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.86%	44.52%	-12.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.01%	37.24%	-2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.32%	34.13%	+2.19%

Dividends

LYMZ.DE vs. INTU - Dividend Comparison

LYMZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTU Intuit Inc.	1.56%	0.65%	0.60%	0.52%	0.72%	0.38%	0.57%	0.74%	0.83%	0.89%	1.08%	1.09%
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYMZ.DE and INTU in my portfolio?

LYMZ.DE and INTU have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.