LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE
LYMD.DE (Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LYMD.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India, while XCMC.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LYMD.DE returned 1.77%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for XCMC.DE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMD.DE charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XCMC.DE.
Performance
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 28.51% return.
LYMD.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -11.03% | -10.62% | 15.81% | 14.99% | -2.96% | -1.72% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMD.DE and XCMC.DE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between LYMD.DE and XCMC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYMD.DE
XCMC.DE
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMD.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.32 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 3.72 | -4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 8.44 | -9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMD.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 1.66 | -2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, which is greater than XCMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and XCMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMD.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.71% | -22.91% | -45.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.60% | -7.80% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.55% | -14.82% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.17% | -3.42% | -22.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -12.68% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 3.45% | +6.39% |
Volatility
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) at 4.94%. This indicates that LYMD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMD.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | 4.94% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 15.31% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 17.48% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 17.33% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 17.33% | +2.82% |
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMD.DE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMD.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYMD.DE nor XCMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMD.DE and XCMC.DE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
LYMD.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XCMC.DE is Commodities. LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India, while XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for LYMD.DE and 0.19% for XCMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYMD.DE and XCMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer