PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYM7.DE achieves a 27.20% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LYM7.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 9.49%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.


LYM7.DE

1D
-1.67%
1M
3.59%
YTD
27.20%
6M
27.77%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
20.29%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
9.49%

IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
3.11%
YTD
25.82%
6M
26.34%
1Y
45.77%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYM7.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc
27.20%18.53%13.45%4.98%-14.29%4.13%5.83%21.44%-11.71%20.16%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%7.20%-14.09%7.38%7.07%21.01%-11.06%20.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.99

The correlation between LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYM7.DE
LYM7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
LYM7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYM7.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.59

4.42

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.48

16.00

+0.48

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYM7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYM7.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

2.69

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.53

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.44

-0.20

Drawdowns

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYM7.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYM7.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.32%

-35.06%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-10.52%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-19.17%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-22.01%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.90%

-32.51%

+0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-2.49%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.45%

-9.30%

-5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.91%

+0.06%

Volatility

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) have volatilities of 7.27% and 7.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYM7.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

7.16%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.15%

14.69%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

17.32%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

16.19%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

18.04%

+0.27%

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYM7.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYM7.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYM7.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LYM7.DE.

LYM7.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LYM7.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYM7.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer