PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYLD vs. TRTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYLD vs. TRTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYLD achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than TRTY's 8.59% return.


LYLD

1D
1.01%
1M
1.17%
6M
9.16%
YTD
12.37%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRTY

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.96%
6M
4.23%
YTD
8.59%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYLD vs. TRTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
12.37%12.90%1.20%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
8.59%16.35%-1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between LYLD and TRTY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024

0.64

The correlation between LYLD and TRTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYLD vs. TRTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYLD
LYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYLD vs. TRTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYLDTRTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.48

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

12.40

-4.34

LYLD vs. TRTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the TRTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYLD and TRTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYLD vs. TRTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYLD drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, smaller than the maximum TRTY drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYLD and TRTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYLDTRTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-22.35%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-5.49%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.99%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.14%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

1.54%

+0.81%

Volatility

LYLD vs. TRTY - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) at 2.67%. This indicates that LYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYLDTRTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.67%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

8.65%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

10.06%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

10.55%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.41%

10.41%

+5.00%

LYLD vs. TRTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TRTY's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYLD vs. TRTY - Dividend Comparison

LYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than TRTY's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
2.08%2.79%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
2.92%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYLD and TRTY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYLD has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to TRTY (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYLD dropped -18.64% vs TRTY's -22.35%.

On 1-year performance, TRTY leads with 19.02% vs 18.88% for LYLD. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TRTY has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 18.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LYLD.

TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.08% for LYLD.

LYLD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TRTY is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LYLD and 0.44% for TRTY.

TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYLD and TRTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer