PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYLD vs. SMRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYLD vs. SMRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYLD achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly lower than SMRI's 23.03% return.


LYLD

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.96%
6M
12.69%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.21%

SMRI

1D
0.38%
1M
5.51%
6M
23.61%
YTD
23.03%
1Y
40.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.64K$15.81K$24.70K
$770.42K$508.81K$403.01K

LYLD vs. SMRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
17.01%12.90%1.20%
SMRI
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF
23.03%17.41%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LYLD and SMRI is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2024

0.79

The correlation between LYLD and SMRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYLD vs. SMRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYLD
LYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SMRI
SMRI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SMRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMRI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMRI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYLD vs. SMRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYLDSMRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

5.75

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

16.88

-5.41

LYLD vs. SMRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the SMRI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYLD and SMRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYLD vs. SMRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYLD drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, roughly equal to the maximum SMRI drawdown of -18.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYLD and SMRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYLDSMRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-18.45%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-6.80%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.51%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-2.72%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.32%

-0.07%

Volatility

LYLD vs. SMRI - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Bushido Capital US Equity ETF (SMRI) have volatilities of 3.48% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYLDSMRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

3.61%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

11.80%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

15.09%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

15.84%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

15.84%

-0.49%

LYLD vs. SMRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRI's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYLD vs. SMRI - Dividend Comparison

LYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SMRI's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
2.00%2.79%0.72%0.00%
SMRI
Bushido Capital US Equity ETF
0.86%1.32%0.98%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYLD and SMRI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMRI has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to LYLD (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYLD dropped -18.64% vs SMRI's -18.45%.

On 1-year performance, SMRI leads with 40.59% vs 27.34% for LYLD. On fees, LYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMRI has performed better with a 40.59% return vs 27.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for SMRI.

LYLD has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.86% for SMRI.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LYLD and 0.71% for SMRI.

SMRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYLD and SMRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer