PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYLD vs. EYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYLD vs. EYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYLD achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly lower than EYLD's 23.85% return.


LYLD

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.90%
YTD
8.49%
6M
9.53%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EYLD

1D
-1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
23.85%
6M
25.44%
1Y
45.30%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYLD vs. EYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
8.49%12.90%1.19%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
23.85%29.39%-9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LYLD and EYLD is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYLD vs. EYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYLD
LYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EYLD
EYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYLD vs. EYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYLDEYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.55

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.64

3.34

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.33

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.90

16.12

-7.22

LYLD vs. EYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYLD and EYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYLDEYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.55

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.56

+0.22

Drawdowns

LYLD vs. EYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYLD drawdown since its inception was -18.64%, smaller than the maximum EYLD drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYLD and EYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYLDEYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.64%

-41.82%

+23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-10.52%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-1.52%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-10.29%

+6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.82%

-0.52%

Volatility

LYLD vs. EYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) is 2.19%, while Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that LYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYLDEYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

7.68%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

14.94%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

17.83%

-6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

18.28%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

21.68%

-6.06%

LYLD vs. EYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EYLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYLD vs. EYLD - Dividend Comparison

LYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than EYLD's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
4.89%5.40%5.16%5.54%6.97%7.27%3.02%4.21%7.87%2.77%0.75%
LYLD
Cambria Large Cap Shareholder Yield ETF
2.64%2.79%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYLD and EYLD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EYLD has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to LYLD (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYLD dropped -18.64% vs EYLD's -41.82%.

On 1-year performance, EYLD leads with 45.30% vs 20.39% for LYLD. On fees, LYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EYLD has performed better with a 45.30% return vs 20.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 2.64% for LYLD.

LYLD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EYLD is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LYLD and 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYLD and EYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer