EYLD vs. GVAL
EYLD (Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EYLD is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EYLD returned 11.63%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for GVAL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EYLD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
EYLD vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EYLD achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly higher than GVAL's 17.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EYLD has outperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 11.63%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.
EYLD
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- YTD
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
GVAL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 36.65%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
EYLD vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | 21.34% | 29.39% | 4.72% | 18.77% | -16.10% | 11.44% | 10.13% | 22.00% | -13.74% | 34.90% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 17.43% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EYLD and GVAL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EYLD and GVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EYLD vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EYLD
GVAL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EYLD
GVAL
Technology
EYLD
GVAL
Industrials
EYLD
GVAL
Energy
EYLD
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
EYLD
GVAL
Communication Services
EYLD
GVAL
Utilities
EYLD
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
EYLD
GVAL
Healthcare
EYLD
GVAL
-
Real Estate
EYLD
GVAL
Basic Materials
EYLD
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EYLD vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
EYLD
GVAL
EYLD vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EYLD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.20 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 11.85 | -1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EYLD vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.82%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYLD and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EYLD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.82% | -46.82% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -11.50% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -15.72% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.27% | -30.83% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.82% | -46.82% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -2.28% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -13.78% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 3.10% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EYLD vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.11%. This indicates that EYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EYLD | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 6.11% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.70% | 14.05% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 15.70% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 18.61% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 18.97% | +2.81% |
EYLD vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EYLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EYLD vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
EYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than GVAL's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | 5.02% | 5.40% | 5.16% | 5.54% | 6.97% | 7.27% | 3.02% | 4.21% | 7.87% | 2.77% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EYLD and GVAL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EYLD has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to GVAL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EYLD dropped -41.82% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 10-year performance, EYLD leads with 11.63% vs 11.03% for GVAL. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EYLD has performed better with a 11.63% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EYLD.
EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 2.43% for GVAL.
EYLD is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EYLD and 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EYLD and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer