PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYBK.DE is traded in EUR, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYBK.DE achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 49.24% return.


LYBK.DE

1D
4.37%
1M
6.21%
YTD
8.18%
6M
13.13%
1Y
46.46%
3Y*
46.48%
5Y*
30.03%
10Y*
16.88%

VDPG.L

1D
4.09%
1M
3.56%
YTD
49.24%
6M
55.50%
1Y
78.51%
3Y*
23.73%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYBK.DE
Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc
8.18%91.46%30.53%30.34%0.78%39.97%-22.43%12.22%
VDPG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc
49.24%23.76%1.62%6.31%-6.95%8.58%9.28%-16.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LYBK.DE and VDPG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYBK.DE
LYBK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

VDPG.L
VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYBK.DEVDPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.61

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

5.79

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

20.94

-12.84

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYBK.DE and VDPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYBK.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.98%, which is greater than VDPG.L's maximum drawdown of -43.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYBK.DE and VDPG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYBK.DEVDPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.98%

-43.68%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-13.18%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-24.49%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.32%

-24.49%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.73%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-10.44%

-9.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

3.65%

+1.82%

Volatility

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) is 6.94%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that LYBK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYBK.DEVDPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

10.92%

-3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.63%

19.97%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.23%

22.38%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.51%

21.84%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

24.04%

+4.36%

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYBK.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYBK.DE vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYBK.DE nor VDPG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYBK.DE and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYBK.DE.

LYBK.DE is categorized as Financials Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. LYBK.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Banks, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYBK.DE and 0.15% for VDPG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYBK.DE and VDPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer