PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LXP vs. FR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LXP vs. FR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lexington Realty Trust (LXP) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LXP achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than FR's 6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LXP has underperformed FR with an annualized return of 6.30%, while FR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.22% annualized return.


LXP

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
4.36%
6M
8.79%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
6.30%

FR

1D
0.58%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
6.39%
6M
9.78%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LXP vs. FR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LXP
Lexington Realty Trust
4.36%29.76%-13.18%4.33%-32.96%52.23%4.19%34.94%-7.15%-4.13%
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
6.39%18.17%-2.01%11.91%-25.37%60.33%4.24%47.37%-5.61%15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LXP and FR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1994

0.54

The correlation between LXP and FR shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.74 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

LXP:

$1.58

FR:

$3.57

PE Ratio

LXP:

31.81

FR:

16.90

PS Ratio

LXP:

8.44

FR:

8.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

LXP:

$347.31M

FR:

$744.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LXP:

-$59.41M

FR:

$450.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

LXP:

$196.04M

FR:

$506.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LXP vs. FR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LXP
LXP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LXP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LXP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FR
FR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LXP vs. FR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lexington Realty Trust (LXP) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LXPFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.61

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

8.30

-2.27

LXP vs. FR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LXP Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the FR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LXP and FR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LXPFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.36

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.26

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.50

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.20

0.00

Drawdowns

LXP vs. FR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LXP drawdown since its inception was -87.77%, smaller than the maximum FR drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LXP and FR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LXPFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.77%

-95.42%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-10.24%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.79%

-25.42%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.17%

-35.95%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.17%

-41.12%

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.27%

-6.21%

-14.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-25.36%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.22%

+1.03%

Volatility

LXP vs. FR - Volatility Comparison

Lexington Realty Trust (LXP) and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LXPFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.52%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

13.69%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.05%

19.61%

+3.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.30%

22.81%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.09%

24.35%

+1.74%

Dividends

LXP vs. FR - Dividend Comparison

LXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than FR's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
3.04%3.11%2.95%2.43%2.45%1.63%2.37%2.22%3.01%2.67%2.71%2.30%
LXP
Lexington Realty Trust
7.11%5.50%6.47%5.09%4.84%2.83%3.98%3.88%8.65%7.28%6.39%8.50%

Financials

LXP vs. FR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lexington Realty Trust and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
85.95M
194.83M
(LXP) Total Revenue
(FR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LXP vs. FR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lexington Realty Trust and First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.5%
72.5%
Portfolio components
LXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lexington Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 69.21M and revenue of 85.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.5%.

FR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 141.21M and revenue of 194.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.5%.

LXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lexington Realty Trust reported an operating income of 1.54M and revenue of 85.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

FR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.24M and revenue of 194.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 60.7%.

LXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lexington Realty Trust reported a net income of -1.94M and revenue of 85.95M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

FR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 155.84M and revenue of 194.83M, resulting in a net margin of 80.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LXP and FR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FR has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to LXP (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LXP dropped -87.77% vs FR's -95.42%.

FR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LXP and FR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer