PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FR vs. NRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FR vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FR achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FR has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 11.45%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 28.16% annualized return.


FR

1D
-0.21%
1M
5.51%
6M
15.37%
YTD
16.90%
1Y
42.13%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
8.28%

NRG

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.76%
6M
-11.47%
YTD
-15.15%
1Y
-19.19%
3Y*
55.21%
5Y*
29.91%
10Y*
28.16%
ALL TIME*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$80.31M$90.64M$71.86M
$334.61M$308.87M$365.54M

FR vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
16.90%18.17%-2.01%11.91%-25.37%60.33%4.24%47.37%-5.61%15.50%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-15.15%78.91%78.58%69.36%-23.47%18.54%-2.14%0.69%39.59%133.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FR and NRG is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2003

0.32

The correlation between FR and NRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FR:

$8.73B

NRG:

$28.33B

EPS

FR:

$3.80

NRG:

$1.21

PE Ratio

FR:

17.35

NRG:

111.14

PS Ratio

FR:

8.61

NRG:

0.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

FR:

$759.61M

NRG:

$32.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FR:

$463.00M

NRG:

$4.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

FR:

$389.82M

NRG:

$2.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FR vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FR
FR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FR vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.97

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

-0.55

+4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

-1.15

+14.03

FR vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FR Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FR and NRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FR vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FR drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FR and NRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.42%

-79.41%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-34.24%

+24.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.11%

-34.24%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.95%

-34.24%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.12%

-48.76%

+7.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-26.80%

+22.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-27.98%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

16.41%

-13.32%

Volatility

FR vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) is 6.25%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 15.10%. This indicates that FR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

15.10%

-8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

35.36%

-20.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.26%

46.61%

-26.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

40.41%

-17.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.44%

39.21%

-14.77%

Dividends

FR vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

FR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than NRG's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
2.87%3.11%2.95%2.43%2.45%1.63%2.37%2.22%3.01%2.67%2.71%2.30%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.04%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%

Financials

FR vs. NRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FR and NRG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRG has higher volatility (15.10%) compared to FR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FR dropped -95.42% vs NRG's -79.41%.

FR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FR and NRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer