LX vs. TECB
LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while TECB (iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index. Over the past 5 years, LX returned -25.63%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for TECB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LX vs. TECB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LX achieves a -31.09% return, which is significantly lower than TECB's 14.97% return.
LX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- -31.09%
- 6M
- -31.51%
- 1Y
- -68.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- -25.63%
- 10Y*
- —
TECB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 24.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.47%
- 10Y*
- —
LX vs. TECB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -31.09% | -40.97% | 242.61% | 6.40% | -50.78% | -42.39% | -54.05% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 14.97% | 14.86% | 24.38% | 57.53% | -34.39% | 19.60% | 39.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LX and TECB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LX vs. TECB — Risk / Return Rank
LX
TECB
LX vs. TECB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) and iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LX | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.27 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 1.69 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 4.93 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LX | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.07 | 1.56 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.57 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.70 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
LX vs. TECB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than TECB's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LX and TECB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LX | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -41.62% | -51.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.18% | -16.24% | -55.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.04% | -23.91% | -57.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -41.62% | -48.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.24% | -5.64% | -79.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.32% | -10.17% | -53.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.57% | 5.55% | +44.02% |
Volatility
LX vs. TECB - Volatility Comparison
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) at 7.20%. This indicates that LX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LX | TECB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 7.20% | +15.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 14.03% | +22.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.97% | 17.68% | +46.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.71% | 23.59% | +50.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 323.46% | 25.42% | +298.04% |
Dividends
LX vs. TECB - Dividend Comparison
LX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.45%, more than TECB's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 18.45% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.61% | 0.35% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LX and TECB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to TECB (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LX dropped -93.19% vs TECB's -41.62%.
TECB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LX and TECB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer