LX vs. MINT
LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 5 years, LX returned -25.26%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for MINT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LX vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LX achieves a -27.09% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return.
LX
- 1D
- -4.37%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- -27.09%
- 6M
- -25.96%
- 1Y
- -65.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- -25.26%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 2.70%
LX vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -27.09% | -40.97% | 242.61% | 6.40% | -50.78% | -42.39% | -51.76% | 91.59% | -47.84% | 1,199.07% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 1.81% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LX and MINT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LX vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
LX
MINT
LX vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -67.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 20.53 | -19.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 94.30 | -95.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 939.26 | -940.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | 17.09 | -18.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 5.99 | -6.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 2.47 | -2.43 |
Drawdowns
LX vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LX and MINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -4.62% | -88.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.18% | -0.05% | -72.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.04% | -0.16% | -80.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.23% | -2.42% | -87.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.39% | 0.00% | -84.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.29% | -0.17% | -63.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.99% | 0.00% | +48.99% |
Volatility
LX vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a higher volatility of 22.06% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that LX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.06% | 0.09% | +21.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.69% | 0.20% | +35.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.62% | 0.27% | +63.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.95% | 0.58% | +73.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 323.68% | 0.95% | +322.73% |
Dividends
LX vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
LX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.44%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 17.44% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.28% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LX and MINT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (22.06%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LX dropped -93.19% vs MINT's -4.62%.
MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LX and MINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer