LX vs. FLDR
LX (LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.) is a stock, while FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, LX returned -26.91%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for FLDR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LX vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LX achieves a -33.42% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 1.72% return.
LX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- -33.42%
- 6M
- -35.96%
- 1Y
- -70.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.55%
- 5Y*
- -26.91%
- 10Y*
- —
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
LX vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | -33.42% | -40.97% | 242.61% | 6.40% | -50.78% | -42.39% | -51.76% | 91.59% | -53.14% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.72% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LX and FLDR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LX vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
LX
FLDR
LX vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LX | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -11.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 2.63 | -1.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 9.83 | -10.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 67.02 | -68.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LX vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LX drawdown since its inception was -93.19%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LX and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LX | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.19% | -12.23% | -80.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.18% | -0.47% | -71.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.04% | -0.76% | -80.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.18% | -2.33% | -87.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.74% | 0.00% | -85.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -0.35% | -63.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.66% | 0.07% | +51.59% |
Volatility
LX vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) has a higher volatility of 22.98% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that LX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LX | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.98% | 0.19% | +22.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.54% | 0.60% | +35.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.55% | 0.81% | +62.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.56% | 1.21% | +72.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 322.58% | 5.25% | +317.33% |
Dividends
LX vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
LX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.10%, more than FLDR's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.41% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% |
LX LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. | 19.10% | 9.30% | 2.38% | 11.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LX and FLDR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LX has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LX dropped -93.19% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.69 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LX and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer