LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L
LVNG.L (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds - LVNG.L tracks the Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF while WRDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LVNG.L returned 16.17% vs 22.06% for WRDA.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVNG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for WRDA.L.
Performance
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVNG.L achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.72% return.
LVNG.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 16.17%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LVNG.L Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF | 10.06% | 16.84% | 3.40% |
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.72% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVNG.L and WRDA.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LVNG.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
LVNG.L
WRDA.L
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVNG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 0.81 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 1.18 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVNG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum WRDA.L drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVNG.L and WRDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVNG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -27.39% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -27.39% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.63% | -15.98% | +9.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -8.18% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 18.75% | -15.58% |
Volatility
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that LVNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVNG.L | WRDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 2.72% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 7.90% | +3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 43.22% | -28.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 29.46% | -13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 29.46% | -13.21% |
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVNG.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LVNG.L nor WRDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LVNG.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LVNG.L.
LVNG.L tracks Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LVNG.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.
Find the right allocation for LVNG.L and WRDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer