LVMHF vs. MCD
LVMHF (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) and MCD (McDonald's Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LVMHF in Luxury Goods, MCD in Restaurants. Over the past 10 years, LVMHF returned 17.33%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for MCD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LVMHF vs. MCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVMHF achieves a -25.23% return, which is significantly lower than MCD's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LVMHF has outperformed MCD with an annualized return of 17.33%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.
LVMHF
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- -25.23%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- -14.79%
- 5Y*
- -3.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.33%
MCD
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.28%
- 6M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 1Y
- -6.90%
- 3Y*
- -0.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
LVMHF vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVMHF LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -25.23% | 19.41% | -16.25% | 14.75% | -8.08% | 39.72% | 36.98% | 63.06% | 3.71% | 55.50% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -9.70% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVMHF and MCD is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
LVMHF:
$275.99B
MCD:
$193.69B
LVMHF:
€165.47B
MCD:
$27.45B
LVMHF:
€110.27B
MCD:
$12.10B
LVMHF:
€47.81B
MCD:
$14.46B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVMHF vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank
LVMHF
MCD
LVMHF vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVMHF | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.95 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.32 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | -0.77 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVMHF vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVMHF drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVMHF and MCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVMHF | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -73.20% | +11.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.28% | -21.47% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.08% | -21.47% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.08% | -21.47% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -36.90% | -7.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.13% | -19.08% | -19.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -14.90% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.62% | 8.99% | +7.63% |
Volatility
LVMHF vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (LVMHF) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to McDonald's Corporation (MCD) at 7.67%. This indicates that LVMHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVMHF | MCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.98% | 7.67% | +2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.05% | 13.54% | +10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.18% | 17.57% | +13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.42% | 17.55% | +14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 20.51% | +10.49% |
Dividends
LVMHF vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison
LVMHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than MCD's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVMHF LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.74% | 3.10% | 3.87% | 3.37% | 3.48% | 5.31% | 1.70% | 2.96% | 2.95% | 0.54% | 1.90% | 2.11% |
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.70% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
Financials
LVMHF vs. MCD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne and McDonald's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LVMHF vs. MCD - Profitability Comparison
LVMHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a gross profit of 26.90B and revenue of 40.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.
MCD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LVMHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported an operating income of 13.42B and revenue of 40.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.7%.
MCD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported an operating income of 2.95B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.
LVMHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne reported a net income of 5.18B and revenue of 40.98B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.
MCD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LVMHF and MCD have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVMHF has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to MCD (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVMHF dropped -62.09% vs MCD's -73.20%.
LVMHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVMHF and MCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer