LVHI vs. WLDR
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while WLDR is a Global Equities fund tracking the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 16.14%/yr vs 18.46%/yr for WLDR. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.
Performance
LVHI vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 29.78% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 31.17%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- —
WLDR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 25.70%
- YTD
- 29.78%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 30.20%
- 5Y*
- 18.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 14.47% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -7.43% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 29.78% | 31.24% | 22.74% | 18.93% | -10.44% | 26.77% | -1.93% | 21.54% | -18.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and WLDR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018 | 0.57 |
The correlation between LVHI and WLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
WLDR
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
WLDR
Energy
LVHI
WLDR
Industrials
LVHI
WLDR
Utilities
LVHI
WLDR
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
WLDR
Healthcare
LVHI
WLDR
Basic Materials
LVHI
WLDR
Communication Services
LVHI
WLDR
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
WLDR
Real Estate
LVHI
WLDR
Technology
LVHI
WLDR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
WLDR
LVHI vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 5.66 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.84 | 21.25 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and WLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -44.69% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -8.86% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -20.30% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -23.77% | +11.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.35% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -8.55% | +5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 2.36% | -0.88% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.75%, while Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | WLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 7.56% | -4.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | 14.14% | -6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.62% | 16.93% | -7.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 17.52% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 21.03% | -7.31% |
LVHI vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than WLDR's 7.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.66% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 7.17% | 9.01% | 13.99% | 2.28% | 2.10% | 7.55% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and WLDR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLDR has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to LVHI (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs WLDR's -44.69%.
On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.46% vs 16.14% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 16.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.
WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.17%, compared with 4.66% for LVHI.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while WLDR is Global Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.67% for WLDR.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and WLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer