LVHI vs. QTUM
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.67%/yr vs 27.81%/yr for QTUM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LVHI vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -4.42% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and QTUM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between LVHI and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
QTUM
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
QTUM
-
Energy
LVHI
QTUM
-
Industrials
LVHI
QTUM
Utilities
LVHI
QTUM
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
QTUM
-
Healthcare
LVHI
QTUM
Basic Materials
LVHI
QTUM
-
Communication Services
LVHI
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
QTUM
Real Estate
LVHI
QTUM
-
Technology
LVHI
QTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
QTUM
LVHI vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.47 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 5.32 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.99 | 19.76 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.94 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 1.04 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.03 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -38.45% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -15.26% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -25.39% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -38.45% | +26.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -6.53% | +4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -8.25% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 4.10% | -2.63% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.35%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 13.41% | -11.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 22.31% | -14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 27.73% | -18.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 26.85% | -15.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 27.34% | -13.58% |
LVHI vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LVHI and QTUM have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LVHI vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and QTUM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 15.67% for LVHI. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI and QTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while QTUM is Technology Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Defiance.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer