PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.


LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*

QTUM

1D
3.25%
1M
8.85%
YTD
44.14%
6M
39.20%
1Y
80.80%
3Y*
48.48%
5Y*
27.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-4.42%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
44.14%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and QTUM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.52

The correlation between LVHI and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHI vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
QTUM

Financial Services

23.6%

-

Energy

17.4%

-

Industrials

13.4%
8.7%

Utilities

10.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.7%

-

Healthcare

7.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

6.1%

-

Communication Services

5.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

0.1%
85.1%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
QTUM

-

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
QTUM

-

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
QTUM
8.7%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
QTUM

-

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
QTUM

-

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
QTUM
0.6%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
QTUM

-

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
QTUM
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
QTUM
0.7%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
QTUM

-

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
QTUM
85.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHIQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.47

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.84

5.32

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.99

19.76

+0.23

LVHI vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHIQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.94

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

1.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.03

-0.21

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-38.45%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-15.26%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-25.39%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-38.45%

+26.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-6.53%

+4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-8.25%

+4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

4.10%

-2.63%

Volatility

LVHI vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.35%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

13.41%

-11.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

22.31%

-14.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

27.73%

-18.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

26.85%

-15.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

27.34%

-13.58%

LVHI vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LVHI and QTUM have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

LVHI vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.74%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and QTUM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 15.67% for LVHI. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI and QTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while QTUM is Technology Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Defiance.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer