PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. QLVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 19.60% return.


LVHI

1D
0.74%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.90%
6M
14.14%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*

QLVE

1D
0.48%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.60%
6M
21.24%
1Y
36.46%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
11.90%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%5.09%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
19.60%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and QLVE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.54

The correlation between LVHI and QLVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHI vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
QLVE

Financial Services

23.6%
38.5%

Energy

17.4%
7.2%

Industrials

13.4%
7.1%

Utilities

10.4%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
10.8%

Healthcare

7.4%
7.6%

Basic Materials

6.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

5.8%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Technology

0.1%
59.6%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
QLVE
38.5%

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
QLVE
7.2%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
QLVE
7.1%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
QLVE
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
QLVE
10.8%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
QLVE
7.6%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
QLVE
5.5%

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
QLVE
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
QLVE
10.4%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
QLVE
0.1%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
QLVE
59.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHIQLVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

2.23

+0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.36

3.16

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.45

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

3.19

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.95

12.84

+8.11

LVHI vs. QLVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the QLVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and QLVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHIQLVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.23

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.44

0.59

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.49

+0.33

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QLVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIQLVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-29.96%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-11.60%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-13.29%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-23.94%

+11.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-8.30%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

2.88%

-1.43%

Volatility

LVHI vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) is 3.30%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIQLVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

6.61%

-3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

14.75%

-7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

16.40%

-6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

13.47%

-2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

15.79%

-2.03%

LVHI vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LVHI and QLVE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

LVHI vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than QLVE's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHI
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
4.49%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.39%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and QLVE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to LVHI (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QLVE's -29.96%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 7.88% for QLVE. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI and QLVE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 2.39% for QLVE.

LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and QLVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer