LVHI vs. QLVE
LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) and QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - LVHI tracks the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index while QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.87%/yr vs 7.88%/yr for QLVE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
LVHI vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 19.60% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVE
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- 1Y
- 36.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.90% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 5.09% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 19.60% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 4.16% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and QLVE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between LVHI and QLVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
QLVE
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
QLVE
Energy
LVHI
QLVE
Industrials
LVHI
QLVE
Utilities
LVHI
QLVE
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
QLVE
Healthcare
LVHI
QLVE
Basic Materials
LVHI
QLVE
Communication Services
LVHI
QLVE
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
QLVE
Real Estate
LVHI
QLVE
Technology
LVHI
QLVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
QLVE
LVHI vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 2.23 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 3.16 | +1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.45 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 3.19 | +1.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.95 | 12.84 | +8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.23 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 0.59 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.49 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QLVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -29.96% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -11.60% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -13.29% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -23.94% | +11.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | 0.00% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -8.30% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 2.88% | -1.43% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) is 3.30%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 6.61% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 14.75% | -7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 16.40% | -6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 13.47% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 15.79% | -2.03% |
LVHI vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LVHI and QLVE have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
LVHI vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than QLVE's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.49% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.39% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and QLVE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to LVHI (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QLVE's -29.96%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 7.88% for QLVE. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI and QLVE have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 2.39% for QLVE.
LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and QLVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer