PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. QLVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than QLVD's 2.90% return.


LVHI

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
12.42%
6M
12.76%
1Y
31.92%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*

QLVD

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
2.90%
6M
2.39%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
12.42%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%5.27%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.90%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and QLVD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.73

The correlation between LVHI and QLVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
QLVD

Financial Services

24.1%
24.8%

Energy

16.6%
3.8%

Industrials

13.4%
15.2%

Utilities

10.0%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
11.0%

Healthcare

7.4%
10.6%

Basic Materials

6.8%
4.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.3%

Technology

0.1%
5.3%

Financial Services

LVHI
24.1%
QLVD
24.8%

Energy

LVHI
16.6%
QLVD
3.8%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
QLVD
15.2%

Utilities

LVHI
10.0%
QLVD
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.6%
QLVD
11.0%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
QLVD
10.6%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.8%
QLVD
4.3%

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
QLVD
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.5%
QLVD
5.6%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.8%
QLVD
5.3%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
QLVD
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHIQLVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.14

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

1.01

+4.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.81

2.75

+19.06

LVHI vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and QLVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIQLVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-28.20%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-8.15%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-9.24%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-23.99%

+12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-5.98%

+4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-5.24%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

2.99%

-1.52%

Volatility

LVHI vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.61%, while FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIQLVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.92%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

8.56%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

10.59%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

11.75%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.74%

13.95%

-0.21%

LVHI vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than QLVD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.74%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
3.12%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and QLVD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to LVHI (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.85% vs 5.87% for QLVD. On fees, QLVD is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.85% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVD is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.12% for QLVD.

LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.32% for QLVD.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and QLVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer