LVHI vs. PID
LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) and PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while PID is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.87%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for PID. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PID.
Performance
LVHI vs. PID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 6.59% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 15.87%
- 10Y*
- —
PID
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 17.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
LVHI vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.90% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 6.59% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 24.49% | -6.56% | 25.87% | -11.46% | 19.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and PID is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LVHI and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
PID
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
PID
Energy
LVHI
PID
Industrials
LVHI
PID
Utilities
LVHI
PID
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
PID
Healthcare
LVHI
PID
Basic Materials
LVHI
PID
Communication Services
LVHI
PID
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
PID
Real Estate
LVHI
PID
Technology
LVHI
PID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
PID
LVHI vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 1.82 | +1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | 2.69 | +1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.33 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.43 | +2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.95 | 8.33 | +12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.82 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 0.63 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.27 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and PID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -66.34% | +34.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -7.47% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -13.34% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -22.97% | +10.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -1.14% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -13.04% | +9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 2.18% | -0.73% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. PID - Volatility Comparison
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.55%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | PID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.55% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 7.55% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 9.65% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 13.96% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 17.84% | -4.08% |
LVHI vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. PID - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than PID's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.49% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.24% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and PID have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PID (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs PID's -66.34%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.87% vs 8.72% for PID. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.24% for PID.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while PID is Global Equities. LVHI tracks QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.56% for PID.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and PID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer