PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. MOOD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LVHI having a 13.78% return and MOOD slightly higher at 14.12%.


LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.84%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*

MOOD

1D
0.41%
1M
0.95%
YTD
14.12%
6M
15.59%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%1.29%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
14.12%30.39%12.53%12.56%-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and MOOD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.64

The correlation between LVHI and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
MOOD

Financial Services

23.6%
15.7%

Energy

17.4%
3.7%

Industrials

13.4%
12.6%

Utilities

10.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
5.1%

Healthcare

7.4%
8.4%

Basic Materials

6.1%
4.4%

Communication Services

5.8%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
9.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.5%

Technology

0.1%
27.6%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
MOOD
15.7%

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
MOOD
3.7%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
MOOD
12.6%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
MOOD
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
MOOD
5.1%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
MOOD
8.4%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
MOOD
4.4%

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
MOOD
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
MOOD
9.5%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
MOOD
2.5%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
MOOD
27.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHIMOODDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.45

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

3.46

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.61

10.68

+10.93

LVHI vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and MOOD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIMOODDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-14.34%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-9.71%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-9.71%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.86%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-2.32%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

3.14%

-1.66%

Volatility

LVHI vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIMOODDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

4.19%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

12.73%

-5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.60%

14.49%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

12.13%

-1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

12.13%

+1.62%

LVHI vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than MOOD's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.35%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and MOOD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOOD has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

On 3-year performance, LVHI leads with 21.52% vs 20.20% for MOOD. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 21.52% return vs 20.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.35% for MOOD.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.68% for MOOD.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and MOOD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer