LVHI vs. IXN
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 16.27%/yr vs 19.04%/yr for IXN. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
LVHI vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 26.77% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.42%
IXN
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.14%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 26.77%
- 1Y
- 41.13%
- 3Y*
- 29.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- 23.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.24%
LVHI vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 15.24% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 26.77% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and IXN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LVHI and IXN has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LVHI vs. IXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
IXN
Financial Services
-
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
IXN
-
Energy
LVHI
IXN
Industrials
LVHI
IXN
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
IXN
-
Utilities
LVHI
IXN
-
Healthcare
LVHI
IXN
Basic Materials
LVHI
IXN
-
Communication Services
LVHI
IXN
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
IXN
-
Real Estate
LVHI
IXN
Technology
LVHI
IXN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
IXN
LVHI vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.27 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 3.00 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.51 | 8.66 | +13.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -55.67% | +23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -13.80% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -25.55% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -36.30% | +24.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -11.11% | +10.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -11.24% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 4.76% | -3.29% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.14%, while iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 10.78% | -8.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 22.87% | -15.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 26.35% | -16.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.04% | 25.67% | -14.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 24.76% | -11.05% |
LVHI vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than IXN's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.82% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.63% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and IXN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to LVHI (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs IXN's -55.67%.
On 5-year performance, IXN leads with 19.04% vs 16.27% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IXN has performed better with a 19.04% return vs 16.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.82% for IXN.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while IXN is Technology Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.46% for IXN.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer