LVHI vs. IDLV
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - LVHI tracks the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR while IDLV tracks the S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.66%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for IDLV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDLV.
Performance
LVHI vs. IDLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than IDLV's 2.63% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 29.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
LVHI vs. IDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.03% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 2.63% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 20.09% | -8.02% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and IDLV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between LVHI and IDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. IDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
IDLV
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
IDLV
Energy
LVHI
IDLV
Industrials
LVHI
IDLV
Utilities
LVHI
IDLV
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
IDLV
Healthcare
LVHI
IDLV
Basic Materials
LVHI
IDLV
Communication Services
LVHI
IDLV
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
IDLV
Real Estate
LVHI
IDLV
Technology
LVHI
IDLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. IDLV — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
IDLV
LVHI vs. IDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.18 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.90 | 1.25 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 3.66 | +16.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 0.96 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.51 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.45 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. IDLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum IDLV drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and IDLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -34.65% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -7.54% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -9.97% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -22.52% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -5.69% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -5.95% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.57% | -1.11% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. IDLV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) at 2.51%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.51% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 7.65% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 9.76% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 11.79% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 13.39% | +0.37% |
LVHI vs. IDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. IDLV - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than IDLV's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 4.69% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.80% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and IDLV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to IDLV (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs IDLV's -34.65%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 5.93% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.69% for IDLV.
LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.25% for IDLV.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and IDLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer